Wherein I engage in an ad hominem spray at Fred Nile

30 12 2008

Fred Nile is one of those stereotypical Christian preachers whose arsehole is clenched so tight that he permanently shits diamonds. This, of course, necessitates the disposal of his normal bodily wastes at the other end of the digestive tract. In fact, he’s just had another bowel movement:

The Christian Democrats MLC, the Reverend Fred Nile, had earlier claimed he had the support of both Labor and Coalition MPs for a ban on topless sunbathing.Mr Nile believes people are offended by the practice.

“I think it’s just a matter of having community standards,” he said.

“If we observe those then we can all live together in in harmony.”

This is precisely the same admixture of authoritarianism and abnegation of personal responsibility that we see in the Federal Labor Government’s ISP plan: Society has an obligation to protect me from getting a woody. Fred just throws the Abrahamic faiths’ disgust at the (female) body into the mix. (And it comes as no surprise that the Opus Dei wing of the NSW Liberal Party is supporting him, though other Coalition members have chosen to remain on the sunnier side of the Enlightenment.)

Fred, do us all a favour—find the nearest toilet cubicle, lock the door, and have a good wank. Jesus won’t mind, and you don’t have to worry about anyone else knowing. It will be our little secret. You senile, sociopathic, neurotic, perverted Bible-bashing fuck.


Actions

Information

14 responses

30 12 2008
seantheblogonaut

Yes and like Federal Labour he does not have the support of the people most affected by it ie. the residents.

The dirty old perve just wants to do research into the matter

31 12 2008
paul

“You senile, sociopathic, neurotic, perverted Bible-bashing fuck.”

He he he he, brilliant!

7 01 2009
ozatheist

“You senile, sociopathic, neurotic, perverted Bible-bashing fuck”

tell us what you really think of Fred. lol

It was quite telling that his early complaints about topless bathing had no mention of the Muslims’ problem with nakedness, from what I read he only added that in during a second commentary.

and we all know how much he usually panders to the Muslims ….. NOT.

7 01 2009
AV

When there is a gay to bash or a exposed nipple from which to avert one’s eyes and forcibly avert everyone elses’, fundies of all stripes can be convinced to temporarily put aside their differences.

8 01 2009
novparl

h, rtrnng t yr mn ntrst – “chclt”. Blss.

Disemvowelment. Kills trolls dead.

AV

14 01 2009
Novparl

Hmm. Intrstg d (idea!). Bt ‘m nt dd.

I think I’ll coin the word “trollophobia” for people who have a fear of dissent.
So upsetting for a rigid atheist. Bless.

UK 13.1.9 17:15 real time

14 01 2009
Bruce

There is dissent, and then there is disruption in bad faith.

One doesn’t have to be rigid to recognise the difference.

Why not try the predictable, but on-topic response of criticising Arthur for saying mean things about Fred Nile?

14 01 2009
arthurvandelay

Being a Briton, I daresay novparl is in the happy position of having no idea who Fred Nile is.

I think I’ll coin the word “trollophobia” for people who have a fear of dissent.

What exactly were you dissenting against, novparl? All I saw was abusive rhetoric and nonsense.

So upsetting for a rigid atheist. Bless.

Epic non sequitur. Bless.

15 01 2009
Bruce

Do Britons have their own nude beaches, or do they just ome down to ours for a perv?

15 01 2009
novparl

Mr vn Bgt hv vgl hrd f Mr Nl. t’s ntrstng th nw mrlt f thsts. Cmmntng ff tpc s nrml t hmns. Bt thsts hv sch rgd mnd. Yr hypcrs n ccsng m f bs s t brthtkng fr wrds. “pc nn sqtr.” Yr rpttn s typcl f th thst mss f Ltn s bng mgc lngg (ls n RC dlsn). Blss. Brc – f tht’s srs qstn, ys w d. r w cn g t th Sth f Frnc.

Bye bye, novparl. We’ve all suffered your whining long enough. Bless.

AV

16 01 2009
novparl

Bt y dn’t hv t rd t. Jst skp t ∓ rd nl pnns y gr wth. Gd lmst crtnl dsn’t xst. S stp wrryng nd nj lf.

6 03 2009
joseph

Wow 1 A lot of hatred here towards a righteous man which is rare in OZ today as anything goes.
So much for freedom of speech today with such vitriolic abuse stirs up the thought that these hate mongers would be people to avoid in the dark.
What filth and contempt toward a man who is doing his job and not pandering down to the filth of Australia’s under body.\
I don’t know why the words used against fred Nile were even allowed on the net.

6 03 2009
arthurvandelay

Joseph says:

So much for freedom of speech today

A few sentences later he says:

I don’t know why the words used against fred Nile were even allowed on the net.

Here’s a tip. Put the Bible away and pick up a handbook on critical thinking. It will make you look much less like an idiot next time.

A lot of hatred here towards a righteous man which is rare in OZ today as anything goes.

It’s nothing personal. It’s just that I see Fred’s diseased, neurotic, sex-obsessed, misogynistic, misanthropic, sociopathic brand of Christianity as Talibanism with a restraining bolt. And it’s up to us evil secularists to make sure the restraining bolt remains secured.

20 05 2012
IRS Attorney

I’ve been browsing for exactly this article. Despite the fact that I was intending to find this content I’m genuinely amazed that your experience was so easy to find and ways in which it completely compared to my own experience.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: