“Brain buttons”: what the motherfuck?

17 04 2008

For some of my readers I devote an inordinate amount of blogspace to that particular species of magical thinking known as religious faith, particularly its more nefarious manifestations. Well, as much as I’d hate to disappoint those readers, that’s a situation that is unlikely to change for the foreseeable future. But there are other kinds of magical thinking that should demand our attention, especially where they threaten to weasel their way onto school curricula. Enter “Brain Gym,” a.k.a. “Educational Kinesiology,” the brain-child (boom-boom) of education specialist Dr Paul Dennison and his wife Gail E. Dennison, and based on the proposition that “neural mechanisms can be influenced by specific physical exercises” (Neuroscience and Education). The programme is described on the Brain Gym website FAQ thusly:

Educational Kinesiology (or Edu-K) is the study and application of natural movement experiences to facilitate learning. It focuses on the performance of specific physical activities that activate the brain for optimal storage and retrieval of information. Edu-K is a process for re-educating the mind/body system for accomplishing any skill or function with greater ease and efficiency. [. . .] BRAIN GYM is the registered trademark for an Educational Kinesiology and is the introductory level Edu-K program.

These movements, which include “The Owl,” “The Elephant,” and the “Alphabet 8s” (but not “The Monkey” or “The Beatle”)

were developed from Dr. Dennison’s knowledge of the relationship of movement to perception, and the impact of these on fine motor and academic skills. Others were learned during his training as a marathon runner, his study of vision training, his study of Jin Shin Jitsu (a form of acupressure), and his study of Applied Kinesiology (taught to the public as the Touch for Health synthesis).

Brain Gym is widely used in British state schools, promising “rapid and often dramatic improvements in: concentration, memory, reading, writing, organizing, listening, physical coordination, and more.” On its British website it claims “improvements in exam results” among its benefits.

Whether more attention needs to be paid to the physical dimension of learning is arguable. But it seems the problem with Brain Gym is that it is scientifically bankrupt:

Two leading scientific societies and a charity that promotes scientific understanding [the British Neuroscience Association, the Physiological Society and Sense About Science] have written to every local education authority in the the UK to warn that a programme of exercises being promoted to help child learning relies on “pseudoscientific explanations” and a “bizarre understanding” of how the body works. [. . .] “According to the calls we have received and to the material in the Teacher’s Guide to Brain Gym, children are, for example, being taught special exercises to ‘connect the circuits of the brain’ and ‘unblock’ neural pathways,” the scientists wrote. They believe that promoting these bogus explanations of how the brain operates undermines science teaching in schools.

Other critics charge it with using terms and concepts alien to neuroscience:

For example, there is a claim that, if children provide pressure on their ‘brain buttons’, they can help re-establish the brain organisation required for reading and writing. ‘Brain buttons’ are described as indentations between the 1st and 2nd ribs directly under the collar bone to the right and left of the breastbone. Other exercises include the Cross-crawl, promoted on the basis of activating left/right, top/bottom and back/front areas of the brain simultaneously, and varieties of ‘Hook-up’ for calming and stressrelieving effects.

Brain Gym apparently also advances the thesis that “All liquids [other than water] are processed in the body as food, and do not serve the body’s water needs … Processed foods do not contain water.” Now (and to return the focus of its blog temporarily to its usual target) we’ve already witnessed the eagerness of the UK government (via its faith school initiatives) to sacrifice the integrity of its public education system on the altar of religious faith, echoing trends in the United States and (to a far lesser degree) in Australia, and with the result that Genesis (the book, not the band) is hammering on the doors of science classrooms. But now it seems like <i>anything</i> can get past the vetting process. The Skeptic’s Dictionary has an extensive entry on Brain Gym, but you simply can’t go past Charlie Brooker’s hilarious rant on The Guardian‘s “Comment is Free” blog, which supplies this week’s “quote of the week:

Lots of people clearly think Brain Gym is worthwhile, or they wouldn’t be prepared to pay through the nose for it. If you’re one of them, here’s an exciting new kinesiological exercise that should dramatically increase your self-awareness – and I’m giving it away free of charge. Ready? OK. Curl the fingers of your right hand inward, meeting the thumb to form a circle. Jerk it rhythmically up and down in front of your face. Repeat for six hours. Then piss off.




8 responses

17 04 2008
Barliman Butterbur

Good motherfucking lord AV, I’ve never known you to use such circlejerking language! But that aside: is this Brain Gym program the same one that PBS has been pushing known as “Brain Fitness”? PBS station WGBH talks about it here: http://snipurl.com/24phq [www_wgbh_org]

Please replace my ignorance with holy light: how long has this program been used in British schools? What do parents say about it? What scientifically accepted proof for its effectiveness is available, and who can prove it’s snake oil? Enquiring minds want to know… 🙂


17 04 2008
Barliman Butterbur

PS: How do I upload an avatar, and what must its dimensions and size be?


17 04 2008
Barliman Butterbur

Here’s a site on Brain Gym I got from the Skeptic website:


18 04 2008

Barley: “Brain Gym” is almost as new to me as it is to you, but when I have more info I’ll pass it on.

(Regarding avatars, I suggest you go to the WordPress.com site for more information.)

19 04 2008

It seems education is subject to fads like so much else in society. How do you stand on the debate about phonics, and why is it so ideological?

19 04 2008

How do you stand on the debate about phonics, and why is it so ideological?

I don’t know too much about it, really: it’s a primary school issue.

1 05 2008
Brain Gym redux: I don’t know whether to laugh or cry « Five Public Opinions

[…] A couple of weeks ago I blogged on the Brain Gym phenomenon, a series of physical exercises that promise to improve learning (not to mention something called “languaging”) by manipulating blood flow to the brain and rewiring neural pathways. In Britain, where it is used in many public schools, the programme has come under heavy fire from the press, especially The Guardian (especially that paper’s science writer Ben Goldacre) and Newsnight. In the latter, Brain Gym founder Paul Dennison is subjected to severe pwnage by host Jeremy Paxman: […]

1 02 2009
Parenting advice goes off its meds « Five Public Opinions

[…] blogged about these clowns before, here and here. A friend who works as a primary school teacher in Perth told me that she recently had to […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: